This week's episode is our Seattle Nice City Council Position 8 debate from Tuesday October 1.
Special thanks to candidates Tanya Woo and Alexis Mercedes Rinck, the amazing pros at Town Hall and to the hundreds of civic-minded superstars who turned out to watch both the city council and vice presidential debates.
Our editor is Quinn Waller.
Thanks to Uncle Ike's pot shop for sponsoring this week's episode! If you want to advertise please contact us at realseattlenice@gmail.com
Your support on Patreon helps pay for editing, production, live events and the unique, hard-hitting local journalism and commentary you hear weekly on Seattle Nice.
[00:00:00] [SPEAKER_05]: Hey Seattle Nice listeners just before we get going we really want to thank the hundreds of people who showed up at Town Hall this week for the
[00:00:08] [SPEAKER_05]: debate doubleheader
[00:00:09] [SPEAKER_05]: starting out with the vice presidential debate and following up with the
[00:00:13] [SPEAKER_05]: City Council debate for position 8 if you want to see more live events support unique hard-hitting local journalism and commentary
[00:00:21] [SPEAKER_05]: Just head on over to patreon.com
[00:00:24] [SPEAKER_05]: Slash Seattle nice that's patreon.com slash Seattle nice it's quick. It's easy
[00:00:31] [SPEAKER_05]: It's everyone chipping in to support hard-hitting local journalism and
[00:00:35] [SPEAKER_05]: Commentary and a podcast that really is unique in the Seattle market
[00:00:40] [SPEAKER_05]: We believe in it if you listen to it
[00:00:43] [SPEAKER_05]: You believe in it too help support it now by going to patreon.com
[00:00:48] [SPEAKER_05]: Slash Seattle nice, okay. Here's the show
[00:00:56] You
[00:01:00] [SPEAKER_06]: Hello and welcome to the latest edition of Seattle nice
[00:01:03] [SPEAKER_06]: I'm David Hyde here as always with Erica C Barnett of publicola. Hi, Erica. Hello and political consultant Sandeep Kaushik
[00:01:10] [SPEAKER_06]: Hi, Sandeep. Hey David and an amazing crowd of debate watchers here at Town Hall
[00:01:17] [SPEAKER_06]: For those listening at home you can tell if this crowd has a punch drunk from having listened to about an hour and a half of
[00:01:22] [SPEAKER_06]: Vice presidential debate and before we get going. I just wanted to ask Erica and Sandeep who won well, I
[00:01:31] [SPEAKER_04]: Only thought I only saw part of the debate, but I will say this David they're eating the dog
[00:01:39] [SPEAKER_04]: I think if that's the bar that I think
[00:01:42] [SPEAKER_04]: Vance did better than Trump did you know, I thought walls is pretty good
[00:01:46] [SPEAKER_04]: I'm not sure I saw anything that's gonna move the needle and I could barely watch it
[00:01:50] [SPEAKER_02]: But the part that I saw I just don't trust a guy David who constantly says Sunday
[00:01:56] [SPEAKER_02]: The person's name that he's talking to David and especially when it's a man Sunday talking to women David
[00:02:03] [SPEAKER_02]: So that is really creepy
[00:02:04] [SPEAKER_06]: All right, let's get going our debate and here for our candidates
[00:02:24] [SPEAKER_06]: Thanks to both of you for your civic commitment and and showing up tonight and answering a few questions
[00:02:30] [SPEAKER_06]: Tonya Wu grew up in the Beacon Hill neighborhood
[00:02:33] [SPEAKER_06]: She's a small business person a Chinatown International District neighborhood activist and the incumbent in this race Tonya was appointed to the visit
[00:02:41] [SPEAKER_06]: Seat back in January Alexis Mercedes rink is originally from California
[00:02:46] [SPEAKER_06]: Her prior experience includes work at the University of Washington and for the King County Regional Homelessness Authority
[00:02:51] [SPEAKER_06]: And we're gonna go to Erica first for our first question. Thank you both for being here tonight
[00:02:57] [SPEAKER_02]: Our first question is gonna be about homelessness and we're gonna start with Tonya
[00:03:03] [SPEAKER_02]: Tonya you are on the record as
[00:03:06] [SPEAKER_02]: supporting the mayor's encampment or removal policies critics argue that removing encampments without increasing available shelter just moves people around
[00:03:15] [SPEAKER_02]: Do you think the Herald administration's policies are working and what is your measure of success?
[00:03:20] [SPEAKER_01]: So yes, I do
[00:03:22] [SPEAKER_01]: Support the mayor's plan on the camera removals and that plan involves
[00:03:27] [SPEAKER_01]: sending out
[00:03:28] [SPEAKER_01]: outreach workers
[00:03:30] [SPEAKER_01]: To make contact and offer shelter to every single person
[00:03:34] [SPEAKER_01]: There is an assessment being done to see if this encampment has any life safety issues if it's on a slope if there's
[00:03:41] [SPEAKER_01]: hazards or if it's in a dangerous location or it's blocking a sidewalk and that kind of determines the timeline on when that cabinet
[00:03:49] [SPEAKER_01]: will be removed and
[00:03:51] [SPEAKER_01]: while we haven't really
[00:03:56] [SPEAKER_01]: We definitely do need more shelter we need definitely need to build more housing
[00:04:00] [SPEAKER_01]: But we also have to allow for people to accept services and to have access to services
[00:04:06] [SPEAKER_01]: And a lot of people have been through the broken system where they have not
[00:04:11] [SPEAKER_01]: It been able to go to into a shelter because they couldn't bring their partner
[00:04:13] [SPEAKER_01]: They couldn't bring their pets they couldn't bring their family
[00:04:16] [SPEAKER_01]: And so I think we need to really reach out to people find out what the root cause of why people are outside and really make that connection
[00:04:24] [SPEAKER_01]: My family has the lease hotel apartments
[00:04:27] [SPEAKER_01]: We have about 20 units to house the formerly unhoused and we found out that people were successful when they had outreach workers
[00:04:33] [SPEAKER_01]: When they had connections, we had many people who came into the
[00:04:37] [SPEAKER_01]: Apartments who didn't know how to use a heater and started a fire
[00:04:40] [SPEAKER_01]: So I think making sure that continued outreach that gauge was important making that connection is important for continued success
[00:04:47] [SPEAKER_02]: That was perfectly on time
[00:04:49] [SPEAKER_02]: I just want to point out which I failed to do there's a timer up here that will be going and these questions are for the
[00:04:55] [SPEAKER_04]: Most part all 90 seconds. Yes. Yes, so we're diving right in obviously
[00:05:00] [SPEAKER_04]: Going going right to one of the big issues homelessness. So Alexis a homeless this question for you and obviously 90 seconds as well
[00:05:07] [SPEAKER_04]: So you said you oppose the city's encampment removal policies as they currently exist and would
[00:05:13] [SPEAKER_04]: Would push to sharply reduce the pace of encampment removals including a full ban on removals during the winter months
[00:05:19] [SPEAKER_04]: So should voters be concerned that adopting your approach will lead to a return to the days of the pandemic
[00:05:27] [SPEAKER_04]: When we had large encampments that emerged in parks and near schools and in some instances became associated with with criminal activity
[00:05:36] [SPEAKER_03]: Thank you for the question and double-checking because I'm short
[00:05:40] [SPEAKER_03]: As the most experienced candidate on this stage having worked on homelessness. I would note that
[00:05:46] [SPEAKER_03]: One of the primary metrics right now that the current sweeps
[00:05:49] [SPEAKER_03]: Policy does is really looking at shelter referrals, which we know doesn't get to the root of how we're actually housing folks
[00:05:54] [SPEAKER_03]: Since the pandemic has happened. We've learned better models that work namely the state right-of-way initiative
[00:06:00] [SPEAKER_03]: Which works across the course of weeks?
[00:06:04] [SPEAKER_03]: Identifying and working with folks matching people with the case manager and pointing them to a housing option that works now
[00:06:09] [SPEAKER_03]: That was an investment from the state
[00:06:10] [SPEAKER_03]: But it's a model that now we've implemented across the city between partnership with washjot
[00:06:15] [SPEAKER_03]: King County regional homelessness authority and city departments and successfully resolved and gotten folks into housing and actually found that
[00:06:22] [SPEAKER_03]: 73% of folks who went through that program remained housed a year later
[00:06:26] [SPEAKER_03]: We've learned programs that work more effectively and we know that we need to scale them
[00:06:31] [SPEAKER_03]: Family shelter intake line just for example on a nightly basis is unable to place 30 to 50
[00:06:37] [SPEAKER_03]: Families in need of shelter. So I have survived we really need to be scaling our housing solutions immediately
[00:06:46] [SPEAKER_06]: Tanya
[00:06:47] [SPEAKER_06]: Question for you
[00:06:48] [SPEAKER_06]: In a recent debate you called the King County regional homelessness authority a failed organization
[00:06:53] [SPEAKER_06]: Do you think that the city should now consider taking over homeless services and end its agreement to fund the KCRHA?
[00:07:01] [SPEAKER_01]: So right now the city of Seattle is working on interlocal agreement to update to the
[00:07:06] [SPEAKER_01]: Structure of the King County regional homeless authority. I believe there has been a lot of
[00:07:11] [SPEAKER_01]: implementation
[00:07:12] [SPEAKER_01]: issues and as we have heard
[00:07:15] [SPEAKER_01]: The structure of the interlocal agreement defines that there would be one body that would be held accountable
[00:07:23] [SPEAKER_01]: For the results the King County regional homeless authority
[00:07:26] [SPEAKER_01]: My opponent has worked there previously
[00:07:29] [SPEAKER_01]: She authored the five-year plan that would have cost the will the cost about 25 billion dollars and then 12 billion dollars
[00:07:36] [SPEAKER_01]: When I asked my opponent at the last debate about those numbers
[00:07:40] [SPEAKER_01]: She said it was to build housing the King County regional homeless authority is not here to build housing
[00:07:44] [SPEAKER_01]: They are here to shelter or unhoused as quickly as possible the point in time count for our unhoused
[00:07:52] [SPEAKER_01]: Neighbors was the highest ever
[00:07:54] [SPEAKER_01]: And so I believe that there's a lot of things that need to be
[00:07:58] [SPEAKER_01]: Reformed that needs to be looked at and there needs to be measurements results and accountability especially
[00:08:04] [SPEAKER_02]: All right, I Alexis I know you want to respond. I'm gonna ask you a question on the same topic
[00:08:09] [SPEAKER_02]: And you can respond then the KCRHA has been around for five years now
[00:08:13] [SPEAKER_02]: And you were a planner as your opponent mentioned for several of those years
[00:08:17] [SPEAKER_02]: As a council member what actions will you take to turn the ship around at KCRHA?
[00:08:22] [SPEAKER_02]: And at what point if any would you say it's time to shut the experiment down
[00:08:27] [SPEAKER_03]: I'm gonna start with a response and just say, you know
[00:08:29] [SPEAKER_03]: This is is disgraceful because we've talked about this a few times on Tanya
[00:08:34] [SPEAKER_03]: And I've corrected you four times on the record here
[00:08:37] [SPEAKER_03]: Corrected you that the plan does not cost 12 billion dollars the mayor and the county executive would not have voted on a
[00:08:43] [SPEAKER_03]: plan that cost 12 billion dollars
[00:08:46] [SPEAKER_03]: Which tells me two things either you don't know what you're talking about or you're intentionally spreading misinformation about homelessness
[00:08:52] [SPEAKER_03]: Both of which make you unfit to hold public office in terms of changes that needs to happen at KCRHA
[00:08:58] [SPEAKER_03]: I've been clear that the role of KCRHA and the reason why I want to make sure that it is a successful entity is
[00:09:04] [SPEAKER_03]: Because when we have a functional KCRHA, we have the full understanding of our system capacity
[00:09:09] [SPEAKER_03]: We have a single place source of truth where we see how our system is performing
[00:09:12] [SPEAKER_03]: We have the best information in one spot and we're able to be accountable and really see where we're at and where we can go
[00:09:18] [SPEAKER_03]: And so I've called for a stabilization plan for the entity
[00:09:21] [SPEAKER_03]: I left the entity because of operational issues and I still stand by that
[00:09:26] [SPEAKER_03]: I want to make sure that under the leadership of the new CEO
[00:09:29] [SPEAKER_03]: We're setting up the agency for success and it can perform its core function
[00:09:33] [SPEAKER_03]: Which is consolidating the homelessness response system and bringing and setting a table for decision makers to come around and really
[00:09:40] [SPEAKER_03]: invest in solutions that work
[00:09:43] [SPEAKER_02]: Right
[00:09:45] [SPEAKER_02]: Tonya we will give you 30 seconds to respond and then
[00:09:49] [SPEAKER_02]: Alexis will have 30 seconds to respond as well. So let's go over to Tonya
[00:09:55] [SPEAKER_01]: So it is in the media all the stations have reported on this 25 billion dollars plan
[00:10:01] [SPEAKER_01]: That was then moved to 12 billion dollars and as we could see now their very own eyes
[00:10:06] [SPEAKER_01]: This organization is not working what we do need a regional plan and we do want to end homelessness
[00:10:11] [SPEAKER_01]: But we can't have pie in the sky
[00:10:15] [SPEAKER_01]: Unrealistic goals that we can solve all these ongoing issues within five years
[00:10:19] [SPEAKER_01]: We need a realistic plan a plan on the ground from somebody who has actually been in a catmits who have been intense not a plan based on
[00:10:26] [SPEAKER_01]: Surveys of people that were unrealistic. We need definable goals
[00:10:32] [SPEAKER_01]: Alexis
[00:10:42] [SPEAKER_00]: Hey, Seattle nice listeners Seattle politics got you low
[00:10:46] [SPEAKER_00]: We'll get high with Uncle Ike's
[00:10:50] [SPEAKER_00]: Pissed at the mayor
[00:10:52] [SPEAKER_00]: Relax with a dollar joint
[00:10:54] [SPEAKER_00]: Pop a tire in a pothole
[00:10:56] [SPEAKER_00]: Eat a $2.00 gummy and chill
[00:11:00] [SPEAKER_00]: Whether you need something to pump you up for Saturday's protest or a mellow strain for your next sit-in
[00:11:06] [SPEAKER_00]: Ike's is your best friend
[00:11:09] [SPEAKER_00]: Now is the time to roll up Seattle
[00:11:12] [SPEAKER_00]: Download the Ike's app today or head on over to Ike's dot com. That's Ike's dot com
[00:11:25] [SPEAKER_03]: Over a thousand people were consulted on the formation of the five-year plan a plan that lists a number of actions that we could be taking
[00:11:31] [SPEAKER_03]: Within KCRHA to make systems more effective within the private or network when we're reprecuring services to change up our system
[00:11:38] [SPEAKER_03]: Response and with other systems across the board and it's in fine print all of these 70 plus actions within the five-year plan can
[00:11:45] [SPEAKER_03]: Be done within the existing budget many folks had engagement opportunities. We went through a huge robust
[00:11:51] [SPEAKER_03]: Revision process to make sure we were hitting the mark and ultimately it was approved through two boards with unanimous votes and really did bring our region together
[00:12:02] [SPEAKER_04]: Great. Um, yeah, let's move on to the next topic, right?
[00:12:06] [SPEAKER_04]: And I want to ask you both questions that try to get at your your kind of underlying
[00:12:13] [SPEAKER_04]: Approach to governance, right?
[00:12:15] [SPEAKER_04]: So Alexis will start with you
[00:12:18] [SPEAKER_04]: During the primary I got several mailers from your campaign, right?
[00:12:20] [SPEAKER_04]: I'm on the record saying I thought so the the the mess and even there was good and
[00:12:24] [SPEAKER_04]: And in particular in those mailers you pledge to end the divisiveness at City Hall, right?
[00:12:30] [SPEAKER_04]: That was a sort of central theme of your
[00:12:33] [SPEAKER_04]: Of your communications with voters
[00:12:35] [SPEAKER_04]: And so it seems to me though that a lot of the divisiveness at City Hall is driven by what is a very real and sharp philosophical difference
[00:12:44] [SPEAKER_04]: Over and policy disagreement
[00:12:47] [SPEAKER_04]: Between kind of Seattle's left and Seattle's more more kind of you know, moderate whatever you want to call a moderate center left folks
[00:12:53] [SPEAKER_04]: So so as a candidate of the left where specifically will you find common ground?
[00:12:59] [SPEAKER_04]: would say some of the more moderate members of the council now and
[00:13:03] [SPEAKER_04]: You know, yeah
[00:13:05] [SPEAKER_04]: Leave it at that
[00:13:06] [SPEAKER_04]: 90 seconds
[00:13:08] [SPEAKER_03]: Appreciate the question
[00:13:09] [SPEAKER_03]: I've had a lot of experience working on this just given one of the places that I worked which was the sound cities Association
[00:13:14] [SPEAKER_03]: Which is a membership organization representing 38 cities within King County and
[00:13:19] [SPEAKER_03]: Representing all the elected officials within all of those 38 cities and as you can imagine
[00:13:25] [SPEAKER_03]: Across the board from MAGA to Marxist and I mean that literally
[00:13:30] [SPEAKER_03]: And my core role in doing that work
[00:13:33] [SPEAKER_03]: Was not only staffing those members on regional boards and committees to deliver best and important information about what they needed for their decision
[00:13:40] [SPEAKER_03]: Making but supporting those caucus meetings where let's say eight different elected officials from different cities would come together
[00:13:47] [SPEAKER_03]: And I would try and support them in developing a caucus position
[00:13:51] [SPEAKER_03]: And so I've had a lot of experience working with supporting folks with folks
[00:13:55] [SPEAKER_03]: With folks with differing opinions across the board by really focusing on what's the data and what is also the
[00:14:02] [SPEAKER_03]: Matter at hand. What is the issue? Can we agree on what the issue at hand is and what we're going to do to solve it?
[00:14:08] [SPEAKER_03]: I think a core difference and between me here is saying I'm not a particularly ideological person
[00:14:13] [SPEAKER_03]: I'm a data-driven person and I'm focused on how can we ensure that we are moving forward with the best information and really solving problems
[00:14:23] [SPEAKER_04]: Thank you
[00:14:24] [SPEAKER_04]: A follow-up question there for Alexis
[00:14:27] [SPEAKER_04]: So is there a place where and 30 seconds on this right?
[00:14:31] [SPEAKER_04]: Is there is there a place where 30 seconds on the answer not the question? Yeah
[00:14:38] [SPEAKER_04]: I'll make it quick then is there a place where where you can point to where you say
[00:14:43] [SPEAKER_04]: Diverge from Seattle's left on it. I would say position or a particular issue where
[00:14:57] [SPEAKER_04]: Right, you know where where maybe you align
[00:15:00] [SPEAKER_04]: In a different place from you know, we think of kind of is like Seattle left or I mean first
[00:15:05] [SPEAKER_03]: We'd have to define what the left is in a lot of ways and I think we have a myriad of differing opinions on how we get there
[00:15:11] [SPEAKER_03]: But I think just maybe it really boils down to just approach
[00:15:15] [SPEAKER_03]: I'll work with folks across the spectrum to make sure that we are really focused on solving problems and putting in thoughts in front of us
[00:15:21] [SPEAKER_03]: I'm not afraid to say that that I'm wrong about something
[00:15:25] [SPEAKER_03]: And that might be a little bit of a different approach, but it's one that I know works. Thank you
[00:15:30] [SPEAKER_04]: Now we'll move Tanya question for you. It's similarly trying to get it at some thoughts about about governance a 90-second question, right?
[00:15:38] [SPEAKER_04]: So one of the main accusations that your opponents level against you Tanya is that you were appointed to the council because of the backing of big business
[00:15:46] [SPEAKER_04]: Donors who believe you would support their agenda
[00:15:49] [SPEAKER_04]: So can you name an issue where you disagree with the business community or the groups that represent the business community?
[00:15:58] [SPEAKER_01]: So I'm gonna push back on being backed by big business. I did not receive a single cent from big business
[00:16:04] [SPEAKER_01]: So I don't know how I've gotten that reputation of being funded by business or being backed by business
[00:16:09] [SPEAKER_01]: I am a small business owner. I own a small family restaurant
[00:16:13] [SPEAKER_01]: And I grew up in a small family restaurant. You may remember Moon Temple restaurant in Wallingford
[00:16:18] [SPEAKER_01]: my family had Monhey bakery and so a lot of issues that
[00:16:23] [SPEAKER_01]: Small misses deal with especially in the Chinatown National District have to do with public safety
[00:16:28] [SPEAKER_01]: And so I've never worked for I mean the biggest corporation I ever worked for was King 5
[00:16:35] [SPEAKER_01]: I worked there for 10 years
[00:16:36] [SPEAKER_01]: But that was covering and telling stories from communities or from people
[00:16:40] [SPEAKER_01]: And so when you ask me if there is any issues that I may disagree with with big business
[00:16:47] [SPEAKER_01]: That I've been outworked on I'll have to think about it
[00:16:52] [SPEAKER_01]: Because a lot of these big issues that I think our city is facing that are within the purview of the Seattle City Council
[00:17:00] [SPEAKER_01]: Are similar we're looking at things like public safety. How do we address homelessness?
[00:17:04] [SPEAKER_01]: And then how do we build more housing and I'm interested in solutions
[00:17:07] [SPEAKER_01]: I'm interested in making the city better and advancing all these things
[00:17:12] [SPEAKER_01]: And so I think if if you're asking regarding issues outside of the city or with the state
[00:17:19] [SPEAKER_01]: I know where people are always talking about progressive taxes
[00:17:25] [SPEAKER_01]: And so I I think the reason why we haven't been able to pass progressive taxes in Seattle is because
[00:17:33] [SPEAKER_01]: Finish your finish your sentence. Yes. It's basically the progressive any task force identified 12 progressive taxes
[00:17:40] [SPEAKER_01]: And 10 of them were legal by the state
[00:17:42] [SPEAKER_01]: The two that were legal we're currently doing and so we have a lot of restrictions that we're dealing with
[00:17:48] [SPEAKER_06]: So let's turn to another 92nd question. This is for Alexis on public safety
[00:17:54] [SPEAKER_06]: You know, as you know the crime rate spiked
[00:17:57] [SPEAKER_06]: Nationally not just in Seattle but all over the country sort of during and after the pandemic
[00:18:01] [SPEAKER_06]: But here in Seattle the violent crime rate in particular has been
[00:18:06] [SPEAKER_06]: persistent compared to a lot of other cities
[00:18:08] [SPEAKER_06]: 50% more homicides in the first part of this year compared to 2019 the year before the pandemic
[00:18:14] [SPEAKER_06]: so the question
[00:18:15] [SPEAKER_06]: For voters is why are you the right candidate as opposed to your opponent to try and and get at and
[00:18:22] [SPEAKER_06]: address this problem with violent violent crime
[00:18:26] [SPEAKER_03]: In first and foremost Seattle kids deserve to go to school without fear Seattle workers deserve to commute without violence
[00:18:33] [SPEAKER_03]: Seattle small businesses deserve some peace of mind and Seattle residents deserve to live safe
[00:18:37] [SPEAKER_03]: Healthy lives within the city
[00:18:39] [SPEAKER_03]: And at this moment we need all of the above approaches to public safety and we need action today
[00:18:45] [SPEAKER_03]: I support building a public safety system that has a quick response and the right response
[00:18:50] [SPEAKER_03]: Improving first responder staffing across the board from law enforcement behavior health alternative response fire and emergency
[00:18:56] [SPEAKER_03]: Medical is core to that I've been on a ride along and I've been within 911 dispatch to see how our system is working
[00:19:03] [SPEAKER_03]: But it's not enough to just respond
[00:19:05] [SPEAKER_03]: We also need to prevent crime and violence from happening in the first place today in Washington State
[00:19:11] [SPEAKER_03]: Someone is killed with a gun every 12 hours
[00:19:14] [SPEAKER_03]: A nationwide gun violence is the leading cause of death
[00:19:17] [SPEAKER_03]: For children and teens and as the only candidate on this stage endorsed by the Alliance for gun responsibility
[00:19:22] [SPEAKER_03]: I support both funding gun violence prevention
[00:19:24] [SPEAKER_03]: Programming and partnering with our legislature to pass common-sense gun legislation and the city auditor's report and even SPD
[00:19:31] [SPEAKER_03]: Have highlighted some of the crime prevention measures that I support
[00:19:35] [SPEAKER_03]: And they've highlighted these in reports
[00:19:37] [SPEAKER_03]: They've put out in the past two years and in a report specific for little Saigon
[00:19:40] [SPEAKER_03]: Only three of the 68 recommendations have actually been implemented and just yesterday friends of little Saigon published an op-ed in the Times calling for these
[00:19:49] [SPEAKER_03]: Very same investments. We know what we need to do. We need to invest in the solutions
[00:19:55] [SPEAKER_03]: Lastly our communities are safest when they're healthy and how so we need to increase access to treatment and build the affordable housing
[00:20:01] [SPEAKER_03]: We all need to be safe Tanya
[00:20:03] [SPEAKER_06]: Why are you as opposed to your opponent the best candidate to address the spike in violent crime?
[00:20:08] [SPEAKER_01]: I've only been on the council for about eight months
[00:20:11] [SPEAKER_01]: We've done some amazing things. I believe I mean we are really looking at
[00:20:17] [SPEAKER_01]: Solutions and ideas and implementing them so some of the things that we have done we have civilized the police department
[00:20:23] [SPEAKER_01]: We have offered competitive wages to officers. We saw applications go from five a day to 15 a day
[00:20:30] [SPEAKER_01]: We're able to hire the best in the region
[00:20:33] [SPEAKER_01]: We need to staff up our officers
[00:20:36] [SPEAKER_01]: And we also need to make sure that all of these things are in place
[00:20:40] [SPEAKER_01]: We expand the care team our social worker outreach, which has been really amazing to see happen
[00:20:46] [SPEAKER_01]: Based on my work with the community watch. I started an alternative to policing group four years ago
[00:20:50] [SPEAKER_01]: We're still going strong and I want to see more of that in the city
[00:20:53] [SPEAKER_01]: You'll see in a couple of of weeks that I will be
[00:20:57] [SPEAKER_01]: Implementing announcing some exciting things just last week to attack on violence
[00:21:02] [SPEAKER_01]: Which happens in our after-hour night clubs about 10% violent crime happens there between 2 a.m.
[00:21:10] [SPEAKER_01]: The 5 a.m. We're convening a stakeholder group that will work with members of the community to talk about
[00:21:16] [SPEAKER_01]: Recommendations and how do we make these places safer for our young people so that we don't have to go to memorial every month or so
[00:21:23] [SPEAKER_01]: And I think I'm working at his community escalation teams
[00:21:25] [SPEAKER_01]: How do we empower neighborhoods to be able to have the access to resources?
[00:21:31] [SPEAKER_01]: To help people who are in the tent down the street instead of having to call 911 and have a gun the bad show up
[00:21:37] [SPEAKER_01]: how can they have the resources to be able to make that connection to shelter to a
[00:21:44] [SPEAKER_01]: Sober living house and really empower neighborhoods
[00:21:47] [SPEAKER_01]: To because it's gonna take everyone to really solve our problems to get closer to safer cities
[00:21:53] [SPEAKER_02]: If I could make just a request y'all can ignore me if you want, but I love the applause
[00:21:59] [SPEAKER_02]: The booze are bringing down the vibes
[00:22:02] [SPEAKER_02]: And if there is yeah, if we can refrain from that I would love it
[00:22:06] [SPEAKER_02]: It would not think we would all appreciate it, but
[00:22:09] [SPEAKER_02]: The applause is fine. This is this is my I'm just stating a preference here
[00:22:14] [SPEAKER_02]: Okay, so my next question for the candidates is about taxes and jumpstart revenues
[00:22:19] [SPEAKER_02]: The mayor's budget closes a major city deficit by
[00:22:23] [SPEAKER_02]: Reappropriating more than half of next year's jumpstart payroll tax revenues
[00:22:27] [SPEAKER_02]: Which are supposed to go to affordable housing and other purposes to fill the general fund gap
[00:22:32] [SPEAKER_02]: Tanya as a council member will you support using jumpstart revenues this way and if so why?
[00:22:38] [SPEAKER_01]: We do have a $250 million deficit
[00:22:42] [SPEAKER_01]: And how we got here is something we've been looking at these last couple of months
[00:22:46] [SPEAKER_01]: And the mayor just handed down his budget this week
[00:22:49] [SPEAKER_01]: We as a council members are going through the budget very carefully
[00:22:54] [SPEAKER_01]: To make sure that we're making good decisions on making sure that the basic essential services are able to
[00:23:01] [SPEAKER_01]: Carry on we are also involved in you know nothing different than what the previous councils have done
[00:23:09] [SPEAKER_01]: Previous councils have always used excess and jumpstart to help supplement up the budget the general fund
[00:23:16] [SPEAKER_01]: But I think most importantly what we really need to do is look at our small businesses and help our small businesses
[00:23:21] [SPEAKER_01]: Most of the general fund is from being no tax as well as from permits
[00:23:26] [SPEAKER_01]: So the better our small businesses do but the better our city does and the better people are able to make a living wage
[00:23:31] [SPEAKER_01]: And to be able to have jobs and so I think it's a
[00:23:34] [SPEAKER_01]: Teared approach and really making sure our priorities reflected in this budget and so far they are
[00:23:39] [SPEAKER_01]: I mean we have public safety. We have economic development
[00:23:43] [SPEAKER_01]: I've built housing
[00:23:45] [SPEAKER_01]: I my family has the Lisa hotel apartments, which is workforce housing
[00:23:52] [SPEAKER_01]: We only charge rent
[00:23:54] [SPEAKER_01]: People's percentage of their income so no one's charge rent they cannot afford and we need more of that
[00:23:59] [SPEAKER_01]: And so looking at the budget
[00:24:00] [SPEAKER_01]: I believe me to really preserve the buckets in housing green new deal
[00:24:06] [SPEAKER_01]: Econoc development, but then unfortunately do have that deficit
[00:24:10] [SPEAKER_01]: So we will have to make some tough decisions
[00:24:13] [SPEAKER_01]: But I think being able to preserve those buckets as we have done in previous counsel to be essential
[00:24:19] [SPEAKER_02]: Alexa same question for you basically if you don't support using jumpstart this way
[00:24:23] [SPEAKER_02]: What would you propose as an alternative to fill the city's budget deficit?
[00:24:27] [SPEAKER_03]: First and foremost budgets are a statement of our values
[00:24:30] [SPEAKER_03]: We need a budget that reflects long-term solutions and not instead of just quick fixes
[00:24:34] [SPEAKER_03]: And I want to take a moment to celebrate something jumpstart tax is really delivering for Seattle
[00:24:40] [SPEAKER_03]: This is a progressive tax on big businesses dedicated for funding affordable housing equitable development green new deal initiatives
[00:24:46] [SPEAKER_03]: And since it was implemented it has collected more funding than
[00:24:50] [SPEAKER_03]: Initially projected and that surplus has been used to cover deficits
[00:24:54] [SPEAKER_03]: Imagine what it would look like if we fully realize that investment in those areas
[00:24:58] [SPEAKER_03]: We know our communities
[00:25:01] [SPEAKER_03]: Priorities are in housing from getting people inside to making sure everyone's housing is affordable to them and people aren't being displaced
[00:25:08] [SPEAKER_03]: We know our community wants not just quick responses to crime
[00:25:12] [SPEAKER_03]: But crime prevention measures from proven gun violence prevention programs to built environment changes highlighted in the auditor's reports to
[00:25:19] [SPEAKER_03]: Services that disrupt cycles and support people in their path to stabilization
[00:25:23] [SPEAKER_03]: We know this community wants to invest in our young people
[00:25:26] [SPEAKER_03]: Making sure their basic needs are being met while also making sure that they have
[00:25:31] [SPEAKER_03]: After school in Richmond and safe places to be and we know our community wants to live up to the promise of being the emerald city
[00:25:37] [SPEAKER_03]: And paving the way in addressing climate none of that is free
[00:25:41] [SPEAKER_03]: I want to have a realistic conversation about the needs of our city in every neighborhood
[00:25:46] [SPEAKER_03]: And what investments will get us where we want to go
[00:25:48] [SPEAKER_03]: I want us to move away from a budget of Band-Aid solutions to a budget that will set us up for a future where a city is affordable
[00:25:54] [SPEAKER_03]: Accessible climate resilient where people want to raise their families here start small businesses here and come see our innovation
[00:26:02] [SPEAKER_04]: We'll do 30 second follow-up questions on this topic to both candidates and
[00:26:08] [SPEAKER_04]: Tanya, let me start with you
[00:26:10] [SPEAKER_04]: So I just wanted to kind of get clarity in the answer that you gave before it sounds to me like what you're saying
[00:26:15] [SPEAKER_04]: Is that the basic structure of the of the mayor's budget proposal which doesn't involve?
[00:26:22] [SPEAKER_04]: Moving jumpstart revenues over to support the general fund is something that that you're supportive of
[00:26:28] [SPEAKER_01]: the mayor did hand down a bound budgets and
[00:26:33] [SPEAKER_01]: I think if if progressive revenue is
[00:26:36] [SPEAKER_01]: Able to be done would have been done. We're already doing it last council wanted progressive revenue. They have done it
[00:26:42] [SPEAKER_01]: And I think now we have to advocate in the state level to change
[00:26:47] [SPEAKER_01]: policies and change laws to fund our schools
[00:26:50] [SPEAKER_01]: and so I
[00:26:52] [SPEAKER_01]: Right now the mayor's balance budget does use jumpstart
[00:26:56] [SPEAKER_01]: Money, but that's not different than what we have been doing in previous years
[00:27:02] [SPEAKER_04]: So Alexa similar 30 seconds to you
[00:27:05] [SPEAKER_04]: You talked a bit about having a more, you know robust
[00:27:09] [SPEAKER_04]: Conversation rather than quick fixes about the budget, but are you basically saying that you would fill the entire
[00:27:16] [SPEAKER_04]: 250-260 million dollar budget hole with new revenue
[00:27:20] [SPEAKER_03]: Dilly I want to make sure that we are fully realizing the jumpstart investment for its intended purpose
[00:27:25] [SPEAKER_03]: I'm open to and have been vocally supportive of progressive revenue options such as the legal ones that are legal
[00:27:31] [SPEAKER_03]: locally like a local capital gains tax to address some of our other cities basic city services and
[00:27:38] [SPEAKER_03]: I think we should be clear before we love you any type of tax
[00:27:41] [SPEAKER_03]: What are the outcomes we're looking for and making sure that we have stakeholders around the table in agreement for what we're funding
[00:27:48] [SPEAKER_06]: All right
[00:27:49] [SPEAKER_06]: We're sort of keeping with 30 second questions here for a minute. This is our new improved lightning round
[00:27:54] [SPEAKER_06]: We're calling the rapid round
[00:27:55] [SPEAKER_06]: So you get 30 seconds to respond to this already. Yes or no questions
[00:27:59] [SPEAKER_06]: Let's just ask another capital gains question actually Alexis since you brought it up
[00:28:04] [SPEAKER_06]: Last year someone proposed a 2% capital gains tax that would have been revenue neutral
[00:28:08] [SPEAKER_06]: And it would have sort of alleviated some of our more regressive taxes was progressive tax
[00:28:13] [SPEAKER_06]: but it would not have raised new revenue and
[00:28:17] [SPEAKER_06]: Setting aside that particular proposal just what about that concept?
[00:28:20] [SPEAKER_06]: What are your values as a candidate is the idea of leveling a progressive
[00:28:25] [SPEAKER_06]: Capital gains tax that would be revenue neutral something that you would support and why are we not you got 30 seconds
[00:28:30] [SPEAKER_03]: If I'm understanding so leveling a progressive tax to try and be more revenue neutral and
[00:28:35] [SPEAKER_03]: Minimizing it with lower offset
[00:28:38] [SPEAKER_03]: Regressive taxes. Yeah, I think fundamentally
[00:28:40] [SPEAKER_03]: Washington we know Washington States tax code is upside down
[00:28:44] [SPEAKER_03]: Where our lower income community members and middle income are disproportionately paying more into our tax system
[00:28:51] [SPEAKER_03]: We know we do need more revenue
[00:28:53] [SPEAKER_03]: But I understand also just as important making sure that we're taking some of the tax burden off of our lower income
[00:28:58] [SPEAKER_03]: Community members is also really important to me again creating more fairness and our tax system is also a part of this and bringing back
[00:29:05] [SPEAKER_06]: More money into people's pockets is really important to me great Tanya same question revenue neutral capital gains tax
[00:29:12] [SPEAKER_01]: yes, so I
[00:29:14] [SPEAKER_01]: Think we have to make sure it's legal and we have to be very careful about how we do it because affordability is a huge issue for many of
[00:29:20] [SPEAKER_01]: Our for many people we have the transportation levy this year. We had the housing levy last year. We also had the
[00:29:28] [SPEAKER_01]: Libraries education levy coming up and it all heads up. We have to be rates going up
[00:29:32] [SPEAKER_01]: So I'll say like rates going up every single month
[00:29:35] [SPEAKER_01]: So it's it's we really have to be mindful
[00:29:39] [SPEAKER_01]: We also have to think about
[00:29:41] [SPEAKER_06]: Generational wealth and displacements. That's time was that a yes or a maybe
[00:29:47] [SPEAKER_01]: Maybe okay
[00:29:49] [SPEAKER_02]: All right another 30 second question
[00:29:52] [SPEAKER_02]: Given this year's budget crunch should the city put nearly three million dollars a year into a new contract with the score jail and Des Moines
[00:30:00] [SPEAKER_02]: And why are we not and we'll start with Tanya?
[00:30:04] [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, so you have this I'm on the record for voting. Yes on this
[00:30:09] [SPEAKER_01]: You have to realize during the pandemic King County
[00:30:13] [SPEAKER_01]: jail
[00:30:15] [SPEAKER_01]: We've been paying
[00:30:16] [SPEAKER_01]: To to have them house a certain number of people and they kind of because of the pandemic
[00:30:22] [SPEAKER_01]: Lowered that amount. Um, so we weren't able to hire enough people to work in the jail
[00:30:28] [SPEAKER_01]: So they were not able to fulfill the full amount pre-pandemic
[00:30:32] [SPEAKER_01]: score is
[00:30:34] [SPEAKER_01]: Not a private jail their South King County's jail system
[00:30:38] [SPEAKER_02]: And so that's time and I just to I guess to make your point
[00:30:43] [SPEAKER_02]: It's a jail system or it's a jail that is owned by a bunch of South King County cities jointly
[00:30:48] [SPEAKER_02]: So Alexa same question would you support spending that three million dollars or so a year on score?
[00:30:54] [SPEAKER_03]: No
[00:30:55] [SPEAKER_03]: Especially given again the budget deficit environment that we're in we just added to our deficit meeting that other things needed to be
[00:31:02] [SPEAKER_03]: Addressed and balanced in that process when I went and talked to parties who would all be affected by this contract
[00:31:08] [SPEAKER_03]: They continue to emphasize to me the complicated logistics an actual strain
[00:31:12] [SPEAKER_03]: This would create on our judicial system and the anxiety about having this passed without all of those details figured out from strain
[00:31:20] [SPEAKER_03]: On municipal courts to all the staff and having
[00:31:23] [SPEAKER_03]: SPD spends staff time to drive down to Des Moines
[00:31:26] [SPEAKER_03]: There's a number of logistics here. All right, that's time
[00:31:29] [SPEAKER_02]: So next 30 second question
[00:31:32] [SPEAKER_02]: Do you support efforts like Amazon's recent mandate to bring employees back to their downtown offices full-time?
[00:31:38] [SPEAKER_02]: We'll start with Alexis
[00:31:39] [SPEAKER_03]: You know, I think there are a lot of ways that we can be providing downtown revitalization without mandating workers attend downtown
[00:31:46] [SPEAKER_03]: I think there's a lot more kind of revitalization efforts particularly on the arts and culture front that naturally would entice and bring people to
[00:31:54] [SPEAKER_03]: Downtown we still have a number of amazing cultural institutions in theaters and providing support to
[00:31:59] [SPEAKER_03]: People who work in the arts is more of a priority to me again
[00:32:02] [SPEAKER_03]: We want to make downtown a fun place where folks want to go on the weekends to see shows and what have you
[00:32:08] [SPEAKER_03]: That will continue to just build on itself. And so I'm more supportive of other measures
[00:32:13] [SPEAKER_01]: Same question. So for the city of Seattle, we have a three-day
[00:32:20] [SPEAKER_01]: mandatory work policy for legislative forwards four days
[00:32:23] [SPEAKER_01]: I'm not gonna tell private businesses what they sure should not do
[00:32:26] [SPEAKER_01]: But I believe it's been really collaborative having people in the office four days a week
[00:32:31] [SPEAKER_01]: We are able to talk and spread ideas and get information really quickly
[00:32:35] [SPEAKER_01]: Also seen that the small businesses around
[00:32:39] [SPEAKER_01]: The city hall and around different areas that have mandated more people coming into work
[00:32:45] [SPEAKER_01]: Has been quite exciting seeing the foot traffic during lunch. And so I think it's baby steps. Thank you
[00:32:50] [SPEAKER_04]: So a question for both of you and Tanya will start with you on this one
[00:32:56] [SPEAKER_04]: Name and 30 seconds. So
[00:33:00] [SPEAKER_04]: Again part of this rapid round
[00:33:02] [SPEAKER_04]: Name one thing you like that may or Harold is accomplished during his time as mayor and one thing maybe you dislike or disagree
[00:33:09] [SPEAKER_01]: Well, I love his one Seattle
[00:33:13] [SPEAKER_01]: Unifying idea. I love the one day of service and going out and meeting
[00:33:18] [SPEAKER_01]: neighbors and in picking up litter cleaning up pee patches
[00:33:22] [SPEAKER_01]: And so I think the mayor's one Seattle
[00:33:26] [SPEAKER_01]: Plan his ideology is really bringing communities together really bringing the city together
[00:33:32] [SPEAKER_01]: And how do we unify people?
[00:33:35] [SPEAKER_01]: Mayor Harold is from community just like I am I'm a fish generation Seattle lights
[00:33:40] [SPEAKER_01]: and
[00:33:40] [SPEAKER_01]: So knowing our communities in all parts time but but just to finish this off
[00:33:45] [SPEAKER_04]: Is there is there a place where you disagree with the mayor? There are a couple places. I disagree with the mayor
[00:33:51] [SPEAKER_01]: One of the places is
[00:33:54] [SPEAKER_01]: sometimes
[00:33:55] [SPEAKER_01]: implementation
[00:33:56] [SPEAKER_01]: Sometimes of how things are made like we always talk about sweeps
[00:34:01] [SPEAKER_01]: I wish there was more engagement. I wish there was more service workers out there
[00:34:07] [SPEAKER_01]: And so it's just not the over general plan or goal, but thank you. Have a go about things
[00:34:14] [SPEAKER_04]: Alex the same question to you. It's something you like about what the mayor's done and something maybe you dislike
[00:34:19] [SPEAKER_03]: I would say the general support for the care team our alternative responder team
[00:34:23] [SPEAKER_03]: I've seen the way in which the the mayor has prioritized and recognized that this is kind of a new arm of our response system
[00:34:30] [SPEAKER_03]: And I've appreciated his support for the team and the allocation of additional positions in the proposed budget
[00:34:35] [SPEAKER_03]: I think I disagree on some of the emphasis on the unified care team
[00:34:39] [SPEAKER_03]: That doesn't count in removals. I think we could be investing that money into things that get folks housed
[00:34:46] [SPEAKER_03]: And so that would be a point of disagreement
[00:34:47] [SPEAKER_04]: And and we did give Tanya a little bit of extra time. So if you want to if you if you would like another 15 seconds
[00:34:52] [SPEAKER_04]: Feel free to say no, we're good. Okay
[00:34:55] [SPEAKER_04]: Just want to make sure thank you
[00:34:58] [SPEAKER_06]: All right
[00:35:01] [SPEAKER_06]: One more quick one
[00:35:02] [SPEAKER_06]: Seattle needs more housing obviously for prices to stabilize probably gonna go down some other cities Portland
[00:35:11] [SPEAKER_06]: Minneapolis are
[00:35:12] [SPEAKER_06]: Experimenting with removing parking requirements entirely for new apartment construction. What about that idea?
[00:35:19] [SPEAKER_06]: I think it's a good one should Seattle experiment with removing parking mandates for new apartments city-wide
[00:35:24] [SPEAKER_03]: Let's start with Alexis short answer. Yes, I think we should be exploring it
[00:35:28] [SPEAKER_03]: I'm interested in making sure that we have folks at the table to understand what all the impacts will would be
[00:35:33] [SPEAKER_03]: Particularly and I have experience working in really balanced atmospheres making sure bringing all the folks around the table and understanding
[00:35:40] [SPEAKER_03]: How we're moving forward so in short it being able to make sure that we are fully addressing the housing crisis and doing everything
[00:35:46] [SPEAKER_03]: We can I think this is an option
[00:35:48] [SPEAKER_03]: We should really seriously pursue and have a very serious conversation about making those changes same question
[00:35:54] [SPEAKER_01]: Thank you. Yes, so I have built housing and I built housing in a transit hub
[00:35:58] [SPEAKER_01]: Which has been quite amazing not having to worry about parking restrictions
[00:36:01] [SPEAKER_01]: And this is something we're looking at council right now in terms of how do we streamline being able to build more?
[00:36:06] [SPEAKER_01]: And I'm really excited about some future legislation that I will be proposing in the next couple of months
[00:36:11] [SPEAKER_01]: I'm working on how do we build more housing quickly?
[00:36:15] [SPEAKER_01]: allowing for those lower
[00:36:17] [SPEAKER_01]: Affordable units and making sure those projects pencil out
[00:36:20] [SPEAKER_01]: I'm looking at how do we build more housing and build trees at the same time you can do both
[00:36:25] [SPEAKER_01]: And so we are looking at things like how do we navigate through design review?
[00:36:29] [SPEAKER_01]: How do we restrict parking recommendations and other things as well people arrested for breaking drug laws?
[00:36:35] [SPEAKER_06]: We'll now be barred from certain areas like Chinatown International District a much of downtown due to a drug policy that you voted for in September
[00:36:41] [SPEAKER_06]: But critics say these new zones aren't going to solve the problem. The drug activities not going to go away
[00:36:48] [SPEAKER_06]: It's just going to move somewhere else the next block or the next neighborhood
[00:36:52] [SPEAKER_06]: So how do you respond to that criticism?
[00:36:54] [SPEAKER_01]: Great. Yes, I supported soda I voted for it
[00:36:56] [SPEAKER_01]: I also supported soap and it's because we are going after the people are causing the most amount of harm to our communities
[00:37:02] [SPEAKER_01]: With soda it's a pre-trial conditional release for drug offenses
[00:37:06] [SPEAKER_01]: And has these zones that were based on data of where the most reports have been for drug sellers
[00:37:13] [SPEAKER_01]: and drug offenses and so basically that was a concern that if you implement these zones
[00:37:19] [SPEAKER_01]: These drug dealers not going to go there. Maybe they'll move have a block down or move into parks or communities surrounding and talking to several
[00:37:29] [SPEAKER_01]: law enforcement people first responders
[00:37:31] [SPEAKER_01]: when
[00:37:33] [SPEAKER_01]: This is not the soda of the past but when soda was instituted earlier
[00:37:38] [SPEAKER_01]: They said that they didn't see this happen
[00:37:40] [SPEAKER_01]: This was not the case and even if people did move they didn't they still moved within a sight line of an officer and
[00:37:46] [SPEAKER_01]: being at
[00:37:47] [SPEAKER_01]: 12th and Jackson and going there often and once a week and I invite all of you to drive by 12th and Jackson
[00:37:53] [SPEAKER_01]: Tonight and you will see what community has been dealing with
[00:37:57] [SPEAKER_01]: We know who's doing what we know who are the people who need help and resources we develop relationships with them
[00:38:03] [SPEAKER_01]: We know who selling drugs. We know who's engaged in the legal market
[00:38:07] [SPEAKER_01]: bit why a little Saigon experienced ten thousand dollars worth of theft a month and
[00:38:13] [SPEAKER_01]: It was the last straw when their employees were coming in the bloody noses and and after being attacked
[00:38:18] [SPEAKER_01]: And so I think the reason why I support is because we are going after people causing harm and allowing for resources
[00:38:25] [SPEAKER_01]: And what's different now than four or five years ago is that we have the care team we have lead we have a delivery care
[00:38:32] [SPEAKER_06]: related question
[00:38:33] [SPEAKER_06]: Alexis about drug policy. I interviewed a family last year who
[00:38:38] [SPEAKER_06]: Lived in the little sign get gone neighborhood their daughter essentially had to walk to school through
[00:38:45] [SPEAKER_06]: You know an area of a lot of drug activity the daughter became
[00:38:48] [SPEAKER_06]: Super freaked out. She was really afraid for her life. Really there were people following home
[00:38:53] [SPEAKER_06]: They were harassing her and eventually
[00:38:55] [SPEAKER_06]: They opted to have her take a bus like 45 minutes away rather than walk the two blocks of school
[00:39:00] [SPEAKER_06]: And this is a family that was you know, like you like a lot of people in Seattle very concerned also about the folks who were
[00:39:08] [SPEAKER_06]: using drugs and
[00:39:10] [SPEAKER_06]: Doing whatever else it was right?
[00:39:12] [SPEAKER_06]: So I know you're concerned about these drug exclusion zones
[00:39:15] [SPEAKER_06]: But if that finally calls your office next year and you're in the city council, what would you say to them?
[00:39:19] [SPEAKER_03]: I think we've identified that the soda zones in particular because we recognize that we have challenges facing those areas
[00:39:25] [SPEAKER_03]: Challenges where we see abject suffering challenges where we see folks who are needed support and the harm is happening for
[00:39:33] [SPEAKER_03]: Neighbors to those areas for folks living outside and small businesses. So if I got that call, which which I already have
[00:39:41] [SPEAKER_03]: Because public safety is front of mind for so many Seattle residents. I really take take it seriously
[00:39:46] [SPEAKER_03]: we also be able to walk outside feel safe in our communities and
[00:39:52] [SPEAKER_03]: Being able to also make sure that we're doing our part to address the issue at heart
[00:39:57] [SPEAKER_03]: Which is the need for making sure that we are providing accessible treatment options
[00:40:01] [SPEAKER_03]: And I think we need to also acknowledge where some of this began decriminalization arose as a necessary response to the evident
[00:40:08] [SPEAKER_03]: failures of
[00:40:09] [SPEAKER_03]: criminalization in addressing our drug crisis and the introduction of fentanyl and meth two of the most
[00:40:14] [SPEAKER_03]: Addictive substances on the planet into the market for often for as little as a dollar has transformed our understanding of drug policy
[00:40:22] [SPEAKER_03]: And now as we look back years later changing laws have not addressed the crisis
[00:40:27] [SPEAKER_03]: But we have learned some things for sure
[00:40:29] [SPEAKER_03]: Imprisoning individuals and imposing fines on drug users and enforcing laws without connecting them to supportive services
[00:40:36] [SPEAKER_03]: Does not curb drug use?
[00:40:38] [SPEAKER_03]: Genuine recovery requires access to effective treatment options and I hear from countless residents across our city from King Street
[00:40:45] [SPEAKER_03]: To Green Lake who are ready to end their addiction
[00:40:48] [SPEAKER_03]: But find themselves unable to get the treatment they nest they desperately need
[00:40:52] [SPEAKER_06]: What would you say to that family when they when you call you up just a 30 second response when they call you up?
[00:40:57] [SPEAKER_03]: What would you say to that family? I always would so I've already gotten a call like this
[00:41:01] [SPEAKER_03]: I ask a lot of questions to say really understand the issue. I ask a lot of questions
[00:41:06] [SPEAKER_03]: I tell them, you know, they deserve to be safe in their community
[00:41:09] [SPEAKER_03]: I talk through have you called contacted SBD has there been an incident?
[00:41:14] [SPEAKER_03]: What has been your interactions with the response system? How quick was that response?
[00:41:18] [SPEAKER_03]: And then also just trying to understand the situation at hand and ensure that our public safety system is operating to the best of its capacity
[00:41:25] [SPEAKER_03]: That's really how I've been responding
[00:41:30] [SPEAKER_01]: Okay 30 seconds. Yeah, so fentanyl is really deadly. It's basically Russian roulette when you take it you live you die
[00:41:37] [SPEAKER_01]: I've done Narcan in front of Summit Sierra High School. I've done CPR some have survived some have not I've done it on
[00:41:45] [SPEAKER_01]: Elders I've done it on young people trying out drugs for the first time without realizing fentanyl isn't it?
[00:41:51] [SPEAKER_01]: This is not the crack cocaine epidemic. This is something totally new and it's deadly and we have to do something about it
[00:41:57] [SPEAKER_01]: And so I I think talking to this family. It's you will see when you drive by
[00:42:04] [SPEAKER_06]: Okay, that's time
[00:42:06] [SPEAKER_02]: All right to quote the moderators with the VP debate
[00:42:09] [SPEAKER_02]: We have a lot of topics to get to so I'm gonna switch sort of back to the budget and policing
[00:42:15] [SPEAKER_02]: One department that is not being cut in the mayor's budget and will actually grow under this budget is the police department
[00:42:21] [SPEAKER_02]: In fact, SPD's budget routinely includes tens of millions of dollars for positions that are not going to be filled
[00:42:28] [SPEAKER_02]: So my question will start with Tanya Tanya
[00:42:31] [SPEAKER_02]: Why should the city keep funding unfilled and unfillable police positions, especially at a time when 159 jobs are on the chopping block?
[00:42:41] [SPEAKER_01]: Well, let's talk about how we got here really quickly. So
[00:42:44] [SPEAKER_01]: Four years ago while we did not technically defund police
[00:42:47] [SPEAKER_01]: We demoralized the police department and 600 officers left the force
[00:42:50] [SPEAKER_01]: we are still over 400 officers short and so
[00:42:55] [SPEAKER_01]: Basically when I talked about how we have
[00:42:58] [SPEAKER_01]: Proved competitive wages and we're able to hire best and better officers in this region through different programs like before the badge
[00:43:05] [SPEAKER_01]: Which is amazing program taking our officers out to our community organizations getting to learn about community
[00:43:10] [SPEAKER_01]: being able to have our CSOs community service officers go out and
[00:43:14] [SPEAKER_01]: Possibly make that connection to hire people from the community as well
[00:43:18] [SPEAKER_01]: And so there is a huge shortage in terms of the first responder staffing
[00:43:24] [SPEAKER_01]: I mean it's not just police departments also firefighters looking at potentially the collapse of different programs in the firefighting
[00:43:32] [SPEAKER_01]: Profession because they can't hire fast enough. So as you will see in the budget that they there are some
[00:43:40] [SPEAKER_01]: Adjustments made for those positions
[00:43:43] [SPEAKER_01]: That we cannot fill but able to hold positions that we will be able to fill this year
[00:43:47] [SPEAKER_01]: And so that has already been accounted for
[00:43:50] [SPEAKER_01]: And many of the business you talked about about being cut there was a hiring freeze early this year
[00:43:55] [SPEAKER_01]: So many of these positions were never filled in the first place and we are gonna be taking a very careful look at those positions
[00:44:00] [SPEAKER_01]: That are on the chopping block. I'm sure you heard that the Seattle Channel might possibly be at risk
[00:44:05] [SPEAKER_01]: I used to work at King 5. I worked with many people who who are there and so
[00:44:11] [SPEAKER_01]: Realizing the importance of telling stories and educating people the government and hoping to save those jobs
[00:44:16] [SPEAKER_02]: Thank you. Just one one point of clarification SPD was not under a hiring freeze
[00:44:23] [SPEAKER_02]: Yes, so similar question for Alexis
[00:44:27] [SPEAKER_02]: You know one thing that we hear often about these positions is we have to fund money for over
[00:44:32] [SPEAKER_02]: We have to extra money in the budget for overtime because there simply aren't enough officers on hand to do
[00:44:38] [SPEAKER_02]: You know all the jobs that need to be done
[00:44:41] [SPEAKER_02]: Do you support eliminating those positions and how do you respond to those concerns?
[00:44:47] [SPEAKER_03]: Well, I think part of the point around this idea of like there are simply things that just need to be done
[00:44:51] [SPEAKER_03]: I really want us to focus in on what is the right right role for a police officer in our community and really
[00:44:56] [SPEAKER_03]: Scoping in and making sure that they're responding to to violent crime and scaling up our other options of folks from
[00:45:02] [SPEAKER_03]: behavioral health crisis
[00:45:03] [SPEAKER_03]: Response and other forms of responders to really meet our communities needs that is a priority for me and
[00:45:10] [SPEAKER_03]: Since that you know
[00:45:11] [SPEAKER_03]: I really want to make sure that we're also having a data-driven discussion about this and not an ideological one
[00:45:16] [SPEAKER_03]: What are the outcomes that our community is looking for from law enforcement?
[00:45:20] [SPEAKER_03]: One of the big ones we talk about is response times
[00:45:23] [SPEAKER_03]: We know that tier one response time right now is 10 minutes
[00:45:26] [SPEAKER_03]: We want to get that down to seven minutes. Are these investments going to get us there?
[00:45:30] [SPEAKER_03]: While also having a discussion of how are we further evaluating the success of our officers are we also
[00:45:36] [SPEAKER_03]: Keeping track of and having less cases of misconduct racial bias or sexism within the department not needing to do a payout
[00:45:43] [SPEAKER_03]: Additionally in relation to officer conduct
[00:45:45] [SPEAKER_03]: So I really want to make sure that we're having a thorough discussion grounded in in a point of what are we looking for from our
[00:45:52] [SPEAKER_03]: law enforcement officers and how are we actually meeting those needs?
[00:45:57] [SPEAKER_04]: Changing topics
[00:45:59] [SPEAKER_04]: The council is going to take up a new comprehensive plan next year, right?
[00:46:04] [SPEAKER_04]: The initial draft of the plan released by Mayor Harrell
[00:46:09] [SPEAKER_04]: Continues to concentrate housing along busy arterials and
[00:46:12] [SPEAKER_04]: When able would enable about a hundred thousand new units of housing over the next 20 years
[00:46:17] [SPEAKER_04]: It's obviously there's been some some pushback against that plan from a
[00:46:23] [SPEAKER_04]: From a fairly interesting coalition that includes both urbanists the Chamber of Commerce and developers some other folks so
[00:46:30] [SPEAKER_04]: Starting with Alexis do you support the comprehensive plan proposal that's been put forward and
[00:46:36] [SPEAKER_04]: Are there things you would change about it?
[00:46:38] [SPEAKER_03]: If so, yeah, well as a renter and just like half of Seattle
[00:46:43] [SPEAKER_03]: We feel the impacts of the housing crisis differently
[00:46:46] [SPEAKER_03]: And I want to ensure that I bring balance to the council and are in being one of the only potential renters
[00:46:51] [SPEAKER_03]: That will be serving on council. I'd bring my that perspective
[00:46:53] [SPEAKER_03]: We know Seattle needs to bring online a hundred and twelve thousand new homes over the next 20 years
[00:46:59] [SPEAKER_03]: And we need a comprehensive plan that accommodates that reality and will serve for it
[00:47:03] [SPEAKER_03]: So I support the recommendations from the complete communities coalition
[00:47:07] [SPEAKER_03]: That is a coalition that includes urbanists advocates housing developers business
[00:47:11] [SPEAKER_03]: And they've put forward a priority such as expanding our middle housing
[00:47:16] [SPEAKER_03]: Expanding transit oriented development in the plan ending exclusionary zoning
[00:47:19] [SPEAKER_03]: And I also want to make sure that we have a meaningful
[00:47:23] [SPEAKER_03]: Antidisplacement strategy within the plan to ensure that we are not continuing Seattle's pattern of displacement for communities of color in Seattle
[00:47:30] [SPEAKER_03]: And we can go on to the wonky bits around all of the pieces that we could do in the comp plan
[00:47:35] [SPEAKER_03]: But I want I want to see more and ensure that we are allowing for zoning changes to develop more housing across our community
[00:47:41] [SPEAKER_03]: And supporting more transit oriented development. Thank you
[00:47:45] [SPEAKER_04]: That's the same question to you the do you support the draft plan put forward by the mayor earlier this year
[00:47:52] [SPEAKER_01]: So I went to every single comprehensive plan meeting and I agree with everybody we need to build more we need to be able to
[00:48:00] [SPEAKER_01]: Have our elders age in place
[00:48:02] [SPEAKER_01]: We'll love to have more families move into Seattle and be able to start going to have their kids going to local schools
[00:48:09] [SPEAKER_01]: And people who work here can live here and so as someone who has built housing who has built affordable housing
[00:48:15] [SPEAKER_01]: We need to do more of that
[00:48:17] [SPEAKER_01]: And I think not only do we look at the comprehensive plan for our for our goal
[00:48:21] [SPEAKER_01]: but we have to look at implementation of this plan and
[00:48:25] [SPEAKER_01]: What I'm hearing is that the justification displacement portion has been taken out
[00:48:29] [SPEAKER_01]: But love to have to see it go back in the plan will probably be released in about two weeks or so
[00:48:38] [SPEAKER_01]: But fighting to make sure that that stays in there as someone who's fought gentrification displacement in one of the most endangered
[00:48:43] [SPEAKER_01]: neighborhoods in the nation my entire life
[00:48:44] [SPEAKER_01]: I would love to see that back in there
[00:48:46] [SPEAKER_01]: We also need to be able to save trees and looking at information environmental impacts as well
[00:48:51] [SPEAKER_01]: And so I am waiting for the plan to drop before I make final decisions on if this is something I recommend
[00:48:58] [SPEAKER_01]: Or something me to add amendments to but when that plan does drop
[00:49:02] [SPEAKER_01]: I'm also really excited because I'm gonna be using the EIS and the CEPA studies from that plan
[00:49:09] [SPEAKER_01]: For legislation that I'm hoping to implement that'll be able to build at housing and build more affordable housing
[00:49:14] [SPEAKER_06]: All right now we're gonna move to
[00:49:19] [SPEAKER_06]: Would be publicola reader Seattle nice listener and town hall audience questions, so special delivery
[00:49:26] [SPEAKER_06]: Oh, and they've been up voted. This is so cool
[00:49:28] [SPEAKER_06]: We're gonna start with there's a publicola question
[00:49:31] [SPEAKER_06]: Somebody writing into Erica. So do you support moving all city council elections to even years?
[00:49:38] [SPEAKER_06]: Why are we not it's called 30 seconds starting with who wants to start show of hands, okay, Alexis? Yes
[00:49:46] [SPEAKER_03]: Yes, absolutely
[00:49:48] [SPEAKER_03]: You know this will be a very interesting test case here. We know there's a ton on the ballot this year
[00:49:52] [SPEAKER_03]: We usually don't vote on on city council races the same time as a presidential
[00:49:55] [SPEAKER_03]: But we know there's a lot more active voter engagement
[00:49:58] [SPEAKER_03]: We tend to see turnout rates higher on even years so anything that ensures that we have more voters engaged in voting and participating
[00:50:05] [SPEAKER_03]: Is critically important to me?
[00:50:07] [SPEAKER_03]: So I would be supportive of that and curious to see how we see things shape up this year in Washington great Tonya
[00:50:13] [SPEAKER_01]: So I ran last year and I also am running obviously this year
[00:50:17] [SPEAKER_01]: And I found out this year was harder to
[00:50:20] [SPEAKER_01]: Break through the presidential election attention in trying to get my messaging out there
[00:50:25] [SPEAKER_01]: So I would prefer to have it on odd years
[00:50:29] [SPEAKER_01]: But at the same time how do we encourage more people to vote during that time?
[00:50:34] [SPEAKER_01]: How do you register hundreds of people and make sure that messaging does get out?
[00:50:39] [SPEAKER_01]: And so I think also it was also very hard honestly to
[00:50:43] [SPEAKER_01]: To be able to hire this year everybody is so excited to work on presidential campaigns
[00:50:48] [SPEAKER_01]: So I think there's a lot of things we have to work through
[00:50:51] [SPEAKER_02]: I'm just going through these questions from the live audience, so I don't know who's question this is
[00:50:56] [SPEAKER_02]: But it's a good one New York City has dropped its congestion pricing plan
[00:51:00] [SPEAKER_02]: Do you think Seattle should lead the country in adopting congestion pricing? And this is also 30 seconds. Let's start with Tonya
[00:51:07] [SPEAKER_01]: I think if this is an equity issue. I mean a lot of people
[00:51:11] [SPEAKER_01]: Who have children who work?
[00:51:14] [SPEAKER_01]: May not be able to not use their cars
[00:51:18] [SPEAKER_01]: I know that we want to be able to make people use transit and I'm excited about st3 coming online
[00:51:26] [SPEAKER_01]: How do you make transit options easier more accessible?
[00:51:30] [SPEAKER_01]: How do you make our streets more walkable?
[00:51:32] [SPEAKER_01]: But I know there are a lot of people and communities who who depend on their cars who have children and don't have many other
[00:51:38] [SPEAKER_01]: Options and so I think we have to really
[00:51:40] [SPEAKER_01]: Have these conversations
[00:51:41] [SPEAKER_01]: Thanks Alexis
[00:51:43] [SPEAKER_03]: Just just thinking thoughtfully it's important to note that because
[00:51:46] [SPEAKER_03]: Seattle has become so affordable for many working people
[00:51:49] [SPEAKER_03]: They've been pushed out of the city and pushed into lengthy commutes in passenger vehicles
[00:51:56] [SPEAKER_03]: Which has of course a ton of implications associated with it
[00:51:59] [SPEAKER_03]: But that's also because we haven't scaled our public transit system to the level that we really need to be
[00:52:04] [SPEAKER_03]: So I'm mindful of some of the equity impacts of this
[00:52:07] [SPEAKER_03]: And I think we really need to be ensuring that we're taking a balanced approach and using carrots and sticks
[00:52:12] [SPEAKER_03]: So how do we find ways to disincentivize folks in passenger vehicles, but also provide enticing alternatives that also help us meet our climate goals
[00:52:24] [SPEAKER_04]: next question and this this comes from one of our
[00:52:27] [SPEAKER_04]: our very exclusive club of Seattle nice
[00:52:31] [SPEAKER_04]: patreon supporters, but
[00:52:34] [SPEAKER_04]: We'll start this question. I think with Tanya, but
[00:52:38] [SPEAKER_04]: Let's say you win this election this November. You're gonna be on the ballot again
[00:52:43] [SPEAKER_04]: Next November right because you're just filling out the end of a term
[00:52:47] [SPEAKER_04]: So how would you define success over the next year?
[00:52:51] [SPEAKER_04]: For your term so that when you get to the ballot say in November of 2025
[00:52:55] [SPEAKER_01]: What would be your definition of having a successful year? Well being in office for eight months. I think my definition success would be
[00:53:04] [SPEAKER_01]: Being able to continue the progress I've made currently in all of the legislation that I've started all the stakeholder
[00:53:11] [SPEAKER_01]: And I've done and be able to make that progress going forward
[00:53:14] [SPEAKER_01]: I mean we cannot go back to the failed policies the last four years that have brought us to where we are today that my
[00:53:20] [SPEAKER_01]: opponent advocates for we cannot go back we have to make progress and we have to go forward and with
[00:53:26] [SPEAKER_01]: Looking at where we're at where we've been and planning for the future
[00:53:30] [SPEAKER_01]: And so there's a lot of things I have in the works
[00:53:33] [SPEAKER_01]: I'm excited to have you learn more about them and and see them happening
[00:53:38] [SPEAKER_01]: Things like how do we make it easier to build housing? How are we able to save trees?
[00:53:42] [SPEAKER_01]: How are we able to make it safer and I am the clear candidate when it comes to having a plan on how do we roll out public safety?
[00:53:49] [SPEAKER_01]: initiatives, I mean my opponent is really vague on her answers
[00:53:53] [SPEAKER_01]: And so I have a plan you see that I'm implementing them right now
[00:53:57] [SPEAKER_01]: And then you'll see all I mean don't you feel like the city has gone better in these last eight months
[00:54:03] [SPEAKER_04]: So so
[00:54:07] [SPEAKER_04]: Alexis a same question to you if you win in November you're gonna be right back on the ball at the following year
[00:54:12] [SPEAKER_04]: What is your definition of success over that year and your first your first year in office?
[00:54:17] [SPEAKER_03]: Absolutely getting things done our community is asking us to act with urgency
[00:54:21] [SPEAKER_03]: Especially on on the climate crisis on the housing crisis
[00:54:25] [SPEAKER_03]: Expanding our transit system making sure our communities are safe our community is asking us to act with urgency
[00:54:30] [SPEAKER_03]: So my goal is to be a day one council member not a council member in training who hasn't introduced legislation in months
[00:54:43] [SPEAKER_06]: Here's one sticking with you Alexis. What do you think is more effective in addressing homelessness increased surveillance and police presence or more affordable housing?
[00:54:51] [SPEAKER_06]: 30 seconds. What was the question? I'm so sorry. Sorry one more time 30 seconds
[00:54:55] [SPEAKER_06]: What do you think is more effective the reader asks in addressing homelessness?
[00:54:59] [SPEAKER_06]: Would it be increased surveillance and police presence or more affordable housing start with you Alexis?
[00:55:05] [SPEAKER_06]: 30 seconds. Yeah
[00:55:08] [SPEAKER_03]: Do I need 30 seconds more affordable housing?
[00:55:10] [SPEAKER_03]: But while I have the time, you know, I do want to say this is a point of contrast
[00:55:14] [SPEAKER_03]: My opponent leverages her identity as a developer of affordable housing
[00:55:18] [SPEAKER_03]: But voted against a revenue neutral option that would have come to no cost of the city
[00:55:23] [SPEAKER_03]: But would have brought online more affordable housing and equitable development
[00:55:25] [SPEAKER_03]: She's yet to introduce legislation that addresses the housing crisis but co-sponsored a ballot alternative
[00:55:30] [SPEAKER_03]: That's not supported by some of our local housing developers
[00:55:33] [SPEAKER_03]: And she's doing all of this while her own tenants are testifying chambers about the conditions of her building broken elevators unsafe conditions
[00:55:40] [SPEAKER_03]: Actions speak louder than words
[00:55:43] [SPEAKER_06]: Same question Tanya increased surveillance and police presence or more affordable housing
[00:55:48] [SPEAKER_01]: So there were a couple of things I want to address
[00:55:50] [SPEAKER_01]: The first one is yes for housing that that's the harder
[00:55:54] [SPEAKER_01]: But I don't subscribe to this either or it has to be all the above and everything
[00:55:59] [SPEAKER_01]: Connected communities as a housing developer. I read the there is a lot of unintentional consequences
[00:56:05] [SPEAKER_01]: That would allow for these community groups to have their land taken away and be taken advantage of by developers
[00:56:11] [SPEAKER_01]: And so I realized that they only can own 10% I could go into the weeds on this
[00:56:17] [SPEAKER_01]: But basically this legislation
[00:56:20] [SPEAKER_01]: Was had a lot of issues based on my experiences and it would have been very risky for these
[00:56:27] [SPEAKER_01]: Community groups also
[00:56:30] [SPEAKER_01]: Oh, did I get a rebuttal time?
[00:56:33] [SPEAKER_01]: 30 seconds. I let's let's let's her respond
[00:56:36] [SPEAKER_02]: I think you want to respond to something that Alexa said and I do want to give you an opportunity but 30 seconds
[00:56:41] [SPEAKER_01]: Okay, sounds good
[00:56:43] [SPEAKER_01]: There was one person who I know this person very well and we were friends previously
[00:56:49] [SPEAKER_01]: But I do not day day day manage the Louisa hotel apartments
[00:56:54] [SPEAKER_01]: I go through an apartment manager
[00:56:57] [SPEAKER_01]: Apartment group that is very well respected in our community and that has
[00:57:02] [SPEAKER_01]: Done a lot of city contracts as well
[00:57:05] [SPEAKER_01]: And so there is a very specific reason why this person has some grievances and that's something that's between me and this person and
[00:57:14] [SPEAKER_01]: I do
[00:57:16] [SPEAKER_01]: That it's great that she's willing to speak
[00:57:20] [SPEAKER_01]: That's okay
[00:57:22] [SPEAKER_02]: So this is a question for both of you and let's keep this one to a minute since we want to get as many reader questions
[00:57:28] [SPEAKER_02]: Is in listener questions as possible? How will you support the protection of Seattle's tree canopy particularly in poor neighborhoods?
[00:57:35] [SPEAKER_02]: While balancing the need for more for fast-tracking more dense housing and let's start with Alexis
[00:57:41] [SPEAKER_03]: Absolutely, I know we need to make sure that we're meeting our tree canopy goals of 30%
[00:57:46] [SPEAKER_03]: I think there's too often the conversation about tree protection
[00:57:50] [SPEAKER_03]: Is pitting tree protection against affordable housing and I just think there's a way forward that protects both
[00:57:57] [SPEAKER_03]: We know we need to be increasing our tree canopy
[00:58:01] [SPEAKER_03]: Especially in communities of color where we have too many urban heat islands
[00:58:05] [SPEAKER_03]: I'm supportive of developing more pocket gardens making sure that we have our we're increasing and maintaining trees that we're also planting
[00:58:14] [SPEAKER_03]: I am supportive of making sure we expand and fully realize our investments in Green New Deal initiatives
[00:58:19] [SPEAKER_03]: Which will support more green spaces coming online
[00:58:22] [SPEAKER_03]: And overall I'm excited to work alongside and really problem-solve around what can we do within the tree ordinance that protects
[00:58:28] [SPEAKER_03]: Larger trees from being cut down since we know the tremendous benefits that they can bring to our communities
[00:58:34] [SPEAKER_01]: So I grew up in Beacon Hill, which is a tree desert at the heat islands
[00:58:39] [SPEAKER_01]: And we need to not only save trees, but also plant more trees
[00:58:44] [SPEAKER_01]: We're not gonna reach Seattle's goal of 30% tree canopy by 2037
[00:58:48] [SPEAKER_01]: I mean we have to do more and this is something we're doing right now
[00:58:51] [SPEAKER_01]: We're looking at the tree ordinance. You may see it pop up soon
[00:58:54] [SPEAKER_01]: But we're doing that legal looking at right now some legislation
[00:58:59] [SPEAKER_01]: I'm looking at is how do we develop at building density if you save trees?
[00:59:04] [SPEAKER_01]: And that's a really important
[00:59:07] [SPEAKER_01]: Topic I chair the sustainability committee and we've done some
[00:59:11] [SPEAKER_01]: Interesting things we've been able to electrify our cruise ship berths our ports able to allow for more EV chargers
[00:59:17] [SPEAKER_01]: By looking at sales to delights electricity. We're able to look at conservation targets
[00:59:22] [SPEAKER_01]: We also have to look at electrifying our our fleet as well as
[00:59:27] [SPEAKER_01]: The conversion the equitable conversion from like from oil to electric
[00:59:33] [SPEAKER_01]: And making sure that information goes out to our fixed income elders and communities of color
[00:59:39] [SPEAKER_02]: Thank you
[00:59:40] [SPEAKER_02]: So I think we're gonna ask just a couple more questions and then give you both an opportunity for a closing statement
[00:59:47] [SPEAKER_02]: and
[00:59:48] [SPEAKER_02]: Maybe one minute on this question. I know folks are getting tired. It's getting late and we're gonna wrap it up shortly
[00:59:53] [SPEAKER_02]: The social housing measure initiative
[00:59:55] [SPEAKER_02]: 137 would impose a new tax on annual earnings above a million dollars to build mixed income housing
[01:00:01] [SPEAKER_02]: And the city council recently voted to put an alternative measure on the ballot that would not do that
[01:00:07] [SPEAKER_02]: It would build affordable housing that's more traditional and would not have a new funding
[01:00:11] [SPEAKER_02]: Question for Tanya. Why did you oppose the original social housing measure and let's do one minute on this one?
[01:00:17] [SPEAKER_01]: So really quickly I did not oppose the original affordable housing measure. I went 37. I'm on the record for endorsing
[01:00:24] [SPEAKER_01]: I won 35 social housing is very similar workforce housing. I've done that
[01:00:28] [SPEAKER_01]: I want to be success. So we definitely need more workforce housing. We need more low lower AMI units of
[01:00:35] [SPEAKER_01]: 50% AMI under and that's desperately needed. I want this I want to succeed. I want social housing to succeed
[01:00:42] [SPEAKER_01]: I want more workforce housing basically and I
[01:00:45] [SPEAKER_01]: Supported an additional measure on the ballots because I believe that people should have choices that they did not like one
[01:00:51] [SPEAKER_01]: They have another and in the end, hopefully this
[01:00:54] [SPEAKER_01]: will get funded
[01:00:56] [SPEAKER_02]: Great Alexis similar question. How do you respond to the council majority's claim that the social housing developer isn't ready for prime time?
[01:01:05] [SPEAKER_03]: We we know we're in a housing crisis
[01:01:07] [SPEAKER_03]: We know our resource or existing resources don't meet the need and with the I-137
[01:01:13] [SPEAKER_03]: Proposed alternative, you know voters are fundamentally faced with the choice of whether or not
[01:01:18] [SPEAKER_03]: We want to cut a slice out of an existing pie or try and grow the pie
[01:01:21] [SPEAKER_03]: And so that is why I've been on the record as being supportive of I-137
[01:01:26] [SPEAKER_03]: I want to ensure that the social housing developer is set up for success and is
[01:01:30] [SPEAKER_03]: Complimentary to the additional work in the affordable housing realm
[01:01:33] [SPEAKER_03]: So how are we really building it upon our work and making sure that we are fully addressing the housing crisis as as we need
[01:01:39] [SPEAKER_03]: To be and as it relates to just the development of the alternative. I think I would just make a note around transparency
[01:01:46] [SPEAKER_03]: You know, I'm all forgiving voters choices, too
[01:01:49] [SPEAKER_03]: But having the alternative proposed so down to the wire close to that the deadline for council to advance something to
[01:01:56] [SPEAKER_03]: The the King County elections to put on the February ballot, you know
[01:02:00] [SPEAKER_03]: We were realizing in real time, you know
[01:02:03] [SPEAKER_03]: What was going to be put out there and so I think just advocating for more transparency?
[01:02:07] [SPEAKER_06]: All right, let's make this
[01:02:09] [SPEAKER_06]: Our last question
[01:02:11] [SPEAKER_06]: Which is just open-ended kind of what didn't we ask you or would you like to emphasize?
[01:02:16] [SPEAKER_06]: Let's start with you Alexis
[01:02:18] [SPEAKER_03]: Okay, well, thank you all for the opportunity to be here tonight as I hope you have heard
[01:02:23] [SPEAKER_03]: I bring experience and the ability to unify folks across the spectrum
[01:02:27] [SPEAKER_03]: I've championed agreements between five north King County cities with unanimous votes under every council and bringing forward a county-wide
[01:02:35] [SPEAKER_03]: plan also under unanimous votes and have a proven ability to really tackle some of our region's hardest challenges
[01:02:43] [SPEAKER_03]: I've since worked in the UW's budgeting office while also working across the University Medical System and balancing priorities
[01:02:49] [SPEAKER_03]: I know division is everywhere. We all feel it, but this is the campaign that is uniting Seattle
[01:02:54] [SPEAKER_03]: This is the campaign that Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates Trust will protect a woman's right to choose
[01:03:00] [SPEAKER_03]: This is the campaign that the Alliance for Gun Responsibility Trust will keep our community safe
[01:03:04] [SPEAKER_03]: This is the campaign that unionized nurses electricians maritime workers machinists trust will fight for working families
[01:03:10] [SPEAKER_03]: And this is the campaign that united all the Democratic Party organizations in Seattle because it will uphold core Democratic Party values
[01:03:31] [SPEAKER_06]: Okay, Tonya same question. Thank you. So
[01:03:36] [SPEAKER_01]: I'm interested in uplifting communities and we all want the same thing for Seattle. We all love our city
[01:03:42] [SPEAKER_01]: I'm not interested in name-calling or bringing other people down
[01:03:46] [SPEAKER_01]: I'm interested in facts and working together to find solutions
[01:03:50] [SPEAKER_01]: And so I always ask people people know I'm a small business owner and people know that
[01:03:55] [SPEAKER_01]: My opponent here worked for the King County Regional Homeless Authority
[01:03:59] [SPEAKER_01]: Downtown partnership for zero
[01:04:01] [SPEAKER_01]: Failed basically and so I always ask people who would you rather want on the running the city running council?
[01:04:08] [SPEAKER_01]: And would you want somebody who's a small business owner who has realistic on-the-ground approaches who has a public safety group that goes to
[01:04:15] [SPEAKER_01]: Jackson their pike and pine every single day that has a plan and that's
[01:04:19] [SPEAKER_01]: Currently working on legislation that you will see in the next couple weeks that will help bring us closer to affordability
[01:04:25] [SPEAKER_01]: public safety and
[01:04:27] [SPEAKER_01]: How do we dress homelessness?
[01:04:29] [SPEAKER_01]: And so or would you rather have somebody who worked for an organization that had?
[01:04:34] [SPEAKER_01]: Ideology a lot of ideological values that were unrealistic and that we probably would not be able to achieve within the next five years
[01:04:42] [SPEAKER_06]: And so okay, thank you. That's time. All right. Let's hear it for our city council candidates
[01:04:48] [SPEAKER_06]: Thanks to all of you for turning out your civic engagement your doubleheader. I mean that's impressive
[01:04:59] [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, thanks everybody. Let's give ourselves a round of applause. Thanks for sticking it out
[01:05:06] [SPEAKER_06]: Thanks to the folks at town hall for hosting this debate. That's it for another edition of Seattle nice. She's Erica C Barnett
[01:05:13] [SPEAKER_06]: He's Sonny Kashik. I'm David Hyde our editor is Quinn Waller our debate
[01:05:18] [SPEAKER_06]: Producer is Jenny Sussell more our time producer is jazz Lacey Holbert. Thanks to everybody so much for listening
